The protocol verifies participants—not every claim they make
Proof of human can establish who is participating and whether a credential is current. Evidence, methodology, fair process, and public review are still required to evaluate what a participant says about a representative or public issue.
Authenticated participation is not the same as representative consensus
A credible claim about community opinion must disclose the number of participants, the relevant population, the selection method, the locality rules, and the level of participation.
The trust layer is neutral
Checks and Balances Committee does not determine how a participant must vote, rate a representative, or express a political position. It verifies participants; connected applications handle evidence and fair process.
A credential proves a real person appeared and matched the credential photo under the applicable process. It does not prove the truth of every statement, legal residence, or universal community consensus.