No, the Checks and Balances Committee is not exclusively for whistleblowers. While whistleblowers play a vital role in exposing misconduct such as criminal offenses, health and safety dangers, environmental risks, miscarriages of justice, legal violations by companies, and coverups of wrongdoing, the Committee serves a broader purpose.

The Checks and Balances Committee provides an avenue for individuals to report abuse of government authority by civil servants who claim to be acting within the scope of their duties but may be overstepping the boundaries of their legally granted powers. These officials, such as enforcement officers or administrators, might be technically operating under the authority of a statute but misapplying that power through misinterpretation or by disregarding the unique circumstances of a particular situation.

In cases where a civil servant's actions ride the line of bad faith conduct without necessarily constituting fraud, endangering public safety, or obstructing justice, the Checks and Balances Committee offers a platform for bringing such behavior to light. By reporting these incidents, citizens can ensure that the public is aware of how their tax dollars are being used and the manner in which civil servants are exercising their authority.

While whistleblowers often report misconduct to external entities like media outlets, government agencies, or law enforcement to expose and rectify wrongdoing, the Checks and Balances Committee serves as an internal mechanism for addressing the misuse of power by government officials. However, it is important to note that whistleblowing related to personal grievances, such as workplace bullying or harassment, is generally not protected unless it is considered to be in the greater public interest.

Any major overhaul of government architecture can take decades, if not generations, and the Directors of the Checks and Balances Committee are not naïve to the significant time, money, resources, and public support needed to achieve both short-term and long-term objectives.

The short-term objectives of committee formation, government reporting, verification, and notification can realistically be accomplished within one year, while the technological automation and Digital ID implementation may only begin development during the same period.

The long-term objective of transitioning Canada's system of governance from a Constitutional Monarchy to a Direct Republic will be achieved in transitional steps over several years. This begins with fulfilling the objectives of P.O.G.G. (Peace, Order, and Good Governance) to achieve Full Responsible Government. Once the technological framework of Full Responsible Government has been implemented, tested, and is fully operational, the technological infrastructure and active participants will allow for a smooth transition to a Direct Republic model.

Navigating the complexities of government cooperation, jurisdictional conflict, and public acceptance will pose challenges along the way. Acknowledging these challenges, the current political climate, and the condition of the body politic increases the probability of the Checks and Balances Committee achieving its functions and objectives.

During the initial stages of establishing several Checks and Balances Committees (CBC) across Canada, volunteers will dedicate their personal time and energy to lay the groundwork. Concurrently, the CBC will seek tax credits as a primary means of financial support. By applying as a Government Contractor, the CBC will position itself as a corporate body that functions in alignment with government objectives, particularly in promoting accountability and fiscal responsibility.

As a Government Contractor, the CBC can secure contracts that fund its initiatives, such as developing technological frameworks for implementing blockchain, digital IDs, algorithms, and the automation of its administrative functions. By acting as a branch of the government, the CBC will not only avoid the need for government grants but will also integrate more seamlessly into the public sector, leveraging its role to establish a balance of responsibility within government operations.

To apply as a Government Contractor or a branch of the government, the CBC will need to meet specific criteria, including demonstrating its capacity to fulfill government objectives, ensuring compliance with public sector standards, and aligning its operations with governmental goals. Once recognized in this capacity, the CBC can access a range of government contracts, ensuring a steady stream of funding through tax credits and other incentives designed to support contractors. This approach will enable the CBC to sustain its activities monetarily while fulfilling its mission of promoting responsible governance across Canada.

The Peaceful Administration Network (P.A.N):
A New Era of Community-Driven Municipal Funding

The Peaceful Administration Network (P.A.N) is pioneering a revolutionary funding mechanism for municipalities through the creation of a Community Trust and a secure Registry system. This innovative approach empowers individuals to contribute directly to the financial sustainability of their communities, all while preserving civil rights and advancing local interests.

A New Model for Community Investment

P.A.N. invites individuals to participate by signing a petition that includes a Declaration of Age of Majority and a Living Will Declaration of Intent. Each signer's commitment is transformed into a valuation point, securely stored in the P.A.N. Registry—a blockchain-based system that ensures transparency and trust.

The collective will of the petition signers forms the foundation of a Community Living Will, managed by the P.A.N. Community Trust, an unincorporated entity. The P.A.N. Registry Inc., an incorporated entity, serves as the voice of the people, facilitating the trade of private exempt securities (bonds) with municipalities. These bonds are issued under recognized frameworks such as National Instrument 45-106 (Canada), SEC Rule 144A (United States), and other global exempt securities laws and regulations such as Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) and the Conduct of Business Sourcebook (COBS) of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK, Article L.411-2 of the French Monetary and Financial Code in France, Article 35 of the Spanish Securities Market Law in Spain, under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) regulations  in India, Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA)  in Japan, under section 708 of the Corporations Act 2001 in Australia, under Financial Markets Act, No. 19 of 2012 , in South Africa, under the Capital Markets Act, No. 17 of 2002, in Kenya, under  the Investments and Securities Act, No. 29 of 2007, in Nigeria, under The Financial Services Commission (FSC) of Jamaica has a rule called "Exempt Distribution Order and many many more communities.

Empowering Municipalities through Innovative Financial Instruments

Municipalities have the opportunity to acquire these private exempt securities from P.A.N. Registry Inc., creating a direct link between community members and local governments. The interest generated from these securities is returned to the Community Trust for distribution to the petition signers, who are the true beneficiaries. Alternatively, the principal may be returned to the Trust, allowing municipalities to retain the interest earned as an incentive for prudent financial management.

This mechanism represents a groundbreaking shift in municipal funding, offering a sustainable alternative to traditional taxation or foreign grants. It ensures that the community's financial contributions are directed back into local projects that matter most, fostering greater civic engagement and ownership.

Aligning Interests for Sustainable Growth

P.A.N. emphasizes the importance of balancing the interests of issuers, investors, and the community when raising capital through municipal bonds. By adhering to regulations that promote transparency, accountability, and responsible investing practices, P.A.N. ensures that all parties benefit from this innovative funding model.

Integration with the Checks and Balances Committee

As the Checks and Balances Committee's support base grows, it may incorporate elements of P.A.N.'s approach, allowing citizens to directly fund their municipalities through innovative financial instruments. This adaptation would align with the Committee's mission to promote financial autonomy and self-sufficiency at the municipal level, reducing dependence on external influences and fostering community-driven governance.

Why Invest in CBC or P.A.N.?

For municipalities, this model offers a reliable, community-backed funding source that strengthens local governance and reduces reliance on external funding. For individuals, it provides a unique opportunity to invest directly in the future of their communities, with the potential for financial returns while advancing civic responsibility. The future of the community is about removing blocks and hazards to the will of the community.   When the community makes a stance and acts on it, CBC and or P.A.N will assist in their sustainability.

The Peaceful Administration Network is more than just a funding mechanism; it's a movement towards a more engaged, financially autonomous, and resilient community. By investing in P.A.N., both public and private stakeholders can be part of a transformative approach to municipal funding that prioritizes the needs and will of the people. 

Within the Trust Indenture for National Concern Trust and Checks and Balances Committee a "Protective Committee" is defined as: a group appointed to represent and safeguard the interests of a specific class of security holders, such as bondholders or preferred stockholders, during corporate restructuring, liquidation, or other major changes. The committee's primary functions include negotiating fair treatment for their class, reviewing and approving plans, keeping class members informed, and taking legal action if necessary to ensure their rights are protected and that they receive an equitable share of the remaining assets or appropriate compensation.

The business activity listed on the certificate of incorporation for Checks and Balances Committee Ltd is listed as:

Securities, commodity contracts, and other financial investment activities. Protective committee for exercising securities holders' protective services (NAICS 523999 - Miscellaneous Financial Investment Activities).

Within the Trust Indenture for National Concern Trust and Checks and Balances Committee "Peace, Order and Good Governance (P.O.G.G.)" is defined as:  Canada's equivalent to the American creed of "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness", puts limits on government power to ensure Representatives are servants of the people, holding an oath of office and indemnity bond so that they do not damage the public and can be held accountable for exercising the powers they hold.

(P.O.G.G. is not to be confused with Peace, Order and Good Govern ment  clause in the opening paragraph of Section 91 of Canada's Constitution Act, 1867 which empowers the federal Parliament to make laws for the "peace, order and good government of Canada" in matters not exclusively assigned to the provinces. The clause gives the federal government in Canada broad authority to legislate for the national welfare, unity and good governance of the country as a whole. It provides flexibility to deal with issues unforeseen in 1867).

Within the Trust Indenture for National Concern Trust and Checks and Balances Committee "Administrative Migration" is defined as: Peace, Order and Good Governance transitioning into Full Responsible Government.

The phrase "Administrative Migration" was first mentioned by Donnie Gibert, author of "A Direct Republic: The Null Hypothesis of Politics", at timestamp 25:55 in this interview.

 "Administrative Migration" is essentially a non-combative approach to re-contracting people into a new system of governance.

"Administrative Migration" could also be described as "Jurisdictional Migration," where people and property migrate back to the original jurisdiction before municipalities formed and incorporated land and its inhabitants into a municipal corporation with its own charter and bylaws. In theory, this occurred over time through contractual trust timelines of abandonment and reacquisition of property.

Within the Trust Indenture for National Concern Trust and Checks and Balances Committee "Full Responsible Government" is defined as: a system of government, similar to a Direct Republic, where government Representatives have self-sovereign Digital IDs and all their government related activities and expenses are tracked, recorded and transparently viewed on a blockchain. Citizens elect/appoint their Representatives directly and vote on how their tax dollars are spent.

The term "Full Responsible Government" is intended to describe the transitional process between a Constitutional Monarchy and a Direct Republic. It is a term used to achieve full accountability and transparency. 

This term was inspired by James Clinkskill, a Canadian politician, engineer, merchant, author, mayor, university governor, and justice of the peace, as written in his memoir "Reminiscences of a Pioneer in Saskatchewan," 1927, co-authored with Arthur Morton. In the memoir, James Clinkskill and his associates corresponded with the Lieutenant Governor to secure funding for the University of Saskatchewan. After much struggle, they obtained the funding, and he declared they had achieved "Full Responsible Government."

The term "Direct Republic" was first coined by Donnie Gibert, author of "A Direct Republic: The Null Hypothesis of Politics". He defines a "Direct Republic" as an organizational model utilizing select parts of a direct democracy and a constitutional republic.

Within the Trust Indenture for National Concern Trust and Checks and Balances Committee "Digital ID" is defined as: a form of identity documentation that is hosted on a blockchain that verifies that an individual is who they claim to be.

The intention is to assign Digital IDs to government officials and civil servants and tie their actions to their Digital ID, transparently recorded on a blockchain. The actions we tie to the Digital ID include their expenses while acting in their official capacity, time spent working, interactions with the public, reports from the public, and any other piece of information that identifies them (political party affiliation, donors, etc.). Since we cannot rely on our civil servants accepting the Digital ID, the Checks and Balances Committee will initiate the process of assignment, verification, and control, revoke, and recovery permissions of the Digital ID.

We are NOT assigning a Digital ID to any individuals that are reporting government activities. These Digital IDs are strictly for government officials and civil servants so we can hold them accountable to their constituents.

The technology adopted for this use case is self-sovereign Digital IDs. This means that the Committee will own and control the Digital ID outright, rather than rented and renewed like a website domain, and the Committee has the ability to change who has recovery and revocation permissions.

Blockchain technology also enables transparent and anonymous voting. In the event that the technology and body politic mature, there will be an opportunity to implement voting on how tax contributions are spent.

The Committee will not force anyone to adopt a Digital ID, and if people see it as an efficient and verifiable use case, the free market will decide for or against it. Future governance models may be implemented most effectively using this type of technology.

On pages 68-69 on the Trust Indenture for National Concern Trust and Checks and Balances Committee (Primary Trustee) it lists all the powers, roles and duties of the Primary Trustee.  

The main duties of the 13 Directors of the Primary Trustee are as follows: Set up Protective Committee, incorporate and establish appropriate accounts for the Checks and Balances Committee, receive claims from the People of Canada and convey claims to Secondary Trustee(s).

On pages 55-56 on the Trust Indenture for National Concern Trust and Checks and Balances Committee it lists all Secondary Trustees, while on page 69 it lists all the roles and duties of the Secondary Trustees as follows:

SECONDARY TRUSTEE(S) ROLE

Office holders of the departments of the Government of Canada and or departments of the government of the Provinces or Territories of Canada. Secondary Trustee(s) will act as fiduciary to the Peoples of Canada and assist in preserving Peace, Order and Good Governance for the transition to Full Responsible Government. Secondary Trustee(s) are prohibited from holding a position of Primary Trustee or be on the Protective Committee of the Checks and Balances Committee in any capacity.

SECONDARY TRUSTEE(S) DUTIES

1. Receive conveyances and assist in the settlement of claims from the Primary Trustee. Office holders of the Secondary Trustee(s) are required to preserve Peace, Order and Good Governance and work toward creating full responsible government by providing information about activities and accounts of the office holders to the Primary Trustee and or Protective Committee when requested.

2. Accept a self-sovereign digital identity presented to the office holders of Secondary Trustee(s) from the committee. Secondary Trustee(s) must accept claims arising from activities of office holders and be indemnified through National Concern Trust.

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF SECONDARY TRUSTEE(S)

1. Submit an oath of office to the Peoples of Canada committing to preserving Peace, Order and Good Governance and promise to work towards Full Responsible Government;

2. Accept indemnification by National Concern Trust;

3. Accept activities of office holders of the Secondary Trustee(s) be published to the Self-Sovereign Digital Identity managed by the Committee.

If office holders of Secondary Trustee(s) fail to submit an oath of office to the Checks and Balances Committee by December 31st, 2024 Secondary Trustee(s) will be in breach of the trust and the committee will submit a report to the appropriate tax authorities.

Within the Trust Indenture for National Concern Trust and Checks and Balances Committee the "CBC Bond," — identified by Instrument Number 2024-001 — serves as a crucial financial tool. This bond functions as collateral for indemnification purposes and addresses unaccounted liabilities. Acting as a surety, it underwrites claims, ensuring that the objectives of the trust are fulfilled by providing the necessary financial backing for discharging liabilities.

The value of this bond is derived from the concept that all hazardous claims—those that have been perfected through Notices of Liability—constitute public debts. The CBC Bond is privately issued, designed specifically to offset these public debts. The underlying proof of concept is straightforward: the bond’s value is based on the accumulation of perfected Notices of Liability, which are recognized as public debts. These debts are then used to balance the private, lawful issue represented by the bond.

The rationale behind this approach lies in the recognition that many illegal and unlawful activities continue unchecked due to the absence of private administration over these liabilities. By assigning a value to the bond with Instrument Number 2024-001, a safety net is created—not only for insurance policy providers but also for public offices tasked with upholding peace, order, and good governance. This safety net is vital for stabilizing the public sector, as it allows for the mitigation of insurance contracts that might otherwise be overwhelmed by countless claims against the very offices they are designed to secure.

Why This Makes Sense

This approach is grounded in a few fundamental principles that align with both financial and legal doctrines:

Public Debt Offset: The concept of using a privately issued bond to offset public debt is not new. Bonds have long been used as instruments to balance public and private sector interests, particularly when it comes to managing large-scale financial obligations. By tying the bond’s value to perfected Notices of Liability—legal instruments that represent a formal recognition of debt—this approach leverages existing financial and legal frameworks to ensure that liabilities are accounted for and managed responsibly.

Indemnification and Surety: The CBC Bond serves as a form of surety, which is a common financial tool used to guarantee the performance of obligations. In this case, the bond guarantees the discharge of claims, ensuring that the trust’s objectives are met. This is particularly important for indemnification purposes, as it provides a financial backstop for public offices and insurance providers, safeguarding them against unanticipated liabilities.

Private Administration of Liabilities: The emphasis on private administration of liabilities addresses a significant gap in the current system. Many liabilities go unmanaged due to a lack of oversight or accountability, leading to potential financial instability. By formalizing the administration of these liabilities through a structured bond, the CBC ensures that these obligations are not only recognized but also managed in a way that protects both public and private interests.

Insurance Stability: Insurance contracts often represent a significant portion of public sector financial risk. By introducing the CBC Bond as a safety net, the approach stabilizes the insurance market, reducing the risk of insolvency or excessive claims that could otherwise destabilize public offices. This not only protects the insurance providers but also ensures that public offices can continue to operate effectively without the burden of overwhelming financial liabilities.

In summary, the CBC Bond with Instrument Number 2024-001 is a sophisticated financial instrument designed to address the growing need for accountable liability management in the public sector. By linking the bond’s value to perfected Notices of Liability, it creates a tangible mechanism for offsetting public debt, stabilizing insurance markets, and ensuring the continued operation of public offices in line with their mandates of peace, order, and good governance. This approach aligns with established financial principles, providing a robust framework for managing public liabilities in a responsible and sustainable manner.

The Notice of Liability (NoL) process is a formal procedure designed to address specific harms or breaches of rights perpetrated by government officials, agencies, or other entities. The process involves the following steps:

1. Identifying the Harm and Liable Parties

- Determine the specific actions, policies, or decisions that caused quantifiable harm or breached your rights. This may include trespasses, thefts, assaults, coercion, or property damage.

- Identify the individuals and entities responsible for the harm, such as government agents, officials, or agencies.

2. Preparing the Notice of Liability

Create a formal NoL document that includes:

- Summary of Facts: A detailed account of the incident, including dates, locations, and parties involved.

- Breaches and Violations: A list of the specific breaches of rights, corresponding penalties, and applicable legal authorities for each violation. For example:

Breach: Armed Theft
Penalty: $200,000
Legal Authority: Criminal Code Section 322

Breach: Unlawful Seizure
Penalty: $200,000
Legal Authority: Criminal Code Section 279

Breach: Emotional Distress
Penalty: $200,000
Legal Authority: 32 CFR § 536.77(a)(3)(vii)

- Calculation of Damages: A breakdown of the total liability owed by multiplying the penalties for each breach by the number of liable parties.

- Demand for Remedy: A clear demand for the restoration of property and correction of wrongs within a specified timeframe, as well as the consequences of non-compliance.

- Supporting Documents: Include relevant exhibits, affidavits, or other evidence to substantiate your claims.

3. Serving the Notice of Liability

Deliver the NoL to each liable party through appropriate channels, such as registered mail or personal service. Allow a reasonable timeframe, such as 10 business days, for the recipients to respond and take corrective action.

4. Pursuing Default Judgment

If the liable parties fail to adequately respond or remedy the situation within the allotted time:

- Issue a Notice of Default, formally documenting their non-compliance and your completion of the administrative process.

- Prepare a Notice of Dishonor with a notary public or two witnesses, establishing the liable parties' tacit agreement to your claims through their failure to respond.

- Proceed with legal action, such as filing liens or court proceedings, to enforce the penalties and damages outlined in the NoL.

By adhering to the NoL process and including the necessary elements demonstrated in the example document, you can effectively assert your rights, hold liable parties accountable, and seek just compensation for the harms you have suffered. The process leverages commercial law principles and provides an administrative remedy outside of the court system.

The following Uniform Commercial Codes (UCC) apply to the Notice of Liability process. These UCC sections provide the legal framework and requirements for the key components of the Notice of Liability process, including negotiability, enforcement, liability, and dishonor:

General Provisions and Definitions
§ 3-104. Negotiable Instrument: Defines the requirements for an instrument to be considered negotiable, which is important for the Notice of Liability to be a valid legal document.

Negotiation, Transfer, and Indorsement
§ 3-201. Negotiation: Outlines how negotiable instruments can be transferred, which is relevant for serving the Notice of Liability to the respondent.

Enforcement of Instruments
§ 3-301. Person Entitled to Enforce Instrument: Specifies who has the right to enforce a negotiable instrument, which would apply to the person issuing the Notice of Liability.

§ 3-305. Defenses and Claims in Recoupment: Lists the defenses that can be used against the right to enforce an instrument, which the respondent may attempt to use to avoid liability.

Liability of Parties
§ 3-401. Signature: Requires that a person is not liable on an instrument unless their signature appears on it, making the signature on the Notice of Liability critical.

Dishonor
§ 3-503. Notice of Dishonor: Describes how notice of dishonor must be given for an endorser or drawer to be held liable, aligning with the Notice of Dishonor step in the Notice of Liability process.

A holder in due course (Checks and Balances Committee) has 3 years from the date the NoL was dishonored or 10 years from the date it was issued, whichever comes first, to collect or sue. For an ordinary holder not in due course, UCC 3-118 provides that an action to enforce a note must be commenced within 6 years after demand for payment is made, and if no demand is made, the action is barred if no payment of interest or principal has been made for 10 continuous years.

The Checks and Balances Committee is receiving Notices of Liability (NoLs) from the public as part of its broader mission to address grievances related to government officials and civil servants, particularly concerning issues such as misuse of taxpayer dollars, conflicts of interest, and other forms of mismanagement.

During the period from 2020 to 2022, many Canadians faced abuses of power, mixed messaging from government officials, and a lack of consideration for special circumstances during what was termed a "public emergency." In response, numerous individuals educated themselves on lawful methods, such as sending NoLs to those in positions of power who were infringing on basic rights, including the right to bodily autonomy.

While some individuals did not fully complete the NoL process, others did but have not yet collected on their claims. The next step for these individuals is either to take the respondent of the NoL to court or seek alternative means of collection. Given the widespread unjust treatment, there is a potential backlog in the courts, which could delay the completion of the process.

The Checks and Balances Committee aims to expedite the resolution of substantive claims by verifying them for viability and settling matters using the original jurisdiction of the courts or tax authorities, acting as a Trustee and holder in due course. A holder in due course has three years from the date the NoL was dishonored or ten years from the date of issue, whichever comes first, to collect. If no demand has been made, the action is barred.

The Committee validates these claims and turns perfected NoLs into Certificates of Claim, which represent a value equation for the insurance agency holding the bond for the public trustee. This process creates a debt liability or trade value that can be recorded and made available for public inspection.

By reporting these Certificates of Claim to the appropriate tax authorities, the Committee promotes responsible governance and holds public officials accountable for their actions. This process not only helps in identifying and rectifying instances of misconduct but also fosters public trust in governmental institutions by demonstrating a commitment to addressing public concerns and enforcing accountability measures.

To submit an NoL to the Checks and Balances Committee, the following guidelines should be followed:

1. NoLs Not Submitted to Court: Any NoL sent to the government between 2020 and 2024 that has not been submitted to court can be directly submitted to the Committee for review and processing.

2. NoLs Submitted to Court: If an NoL has been submitted to court, it may still be submitted to the Committee, but the court docket number must be provided for reference and tracking purposes.

3. Completeness: Ensure that the NoL is complete and includes all relevant information, such as the parties involved, the specific grievances, and any supporting documentation.

4. Submission Method: NoLs can be submitted to the Committee through our email: nol@checksandbalances.services

By adhering to these guidelines, individuals can ensure that their NoLs are properly received and processed by the Checks and Balances Committee, contributing to the overall goal of promoting transparency, accountability, and responsible governance in Canada.

On pages 58-64 of the Trust Indenture for National Concern Trust and Checks and Balances Committee it states "...I hereby make claim to all right, title and interest of the following described land under claim number RN773743604CA (dated April 4, 2024) for the benefit of the Canadian Peoples: ..." then lists the metes and bounds (geographical boundaries) of every Province and Territory of Canada. 

The National Concern Trust, for which the Checks and Balances Committee acts as Trustee, holds a land claim on all public land that is not privately owned or claimed by First Nations. This land claim is included in the trust indenture for several key reasons:

1. Protecting Provincial Assets: The National Concern Trust was formed expressly to protect provincial assets, which includes holding land claims on public land in trust. By including the land claim in the trust indenture, it formalizes the Trust's role as a holder of those land rights and establishes its legal interest and authority over public lands.

2. Safeguarding Against Foreign Entities: The land claim is intended to protect public lands from foreign entities and ensure the preservation of these lands for the benefit of the Canadian people. Including it in the trust indenture solidifies the Trust's mandate to safeguard these assets.

3. Governance Reform: The land claim is part of the Checks and Balances Committee's broader efforts to restructure governance over lands and resources. The background mentions goals of achieving "Full Responsible Government" and transitioning from a "Constitutional Monarchy to a Direct Republic." Asserting a trust-held land claim could be a step in that process.

The Checks and Balances Committee has taken several steps to inform relevant government bodies and officials about the National Concern Trust and its land claim:

- On July 12, 2024, various federal and provincial finance departments, the Governor General, provincial Lieutenant Governors, and other officials were notified about the National Concern Trust and the land claim.

- The Private Secretary to King Charles III was also notified, and an inquiry for formal recognition was made, along with a request for confirmation regarding the ownership of Crown Land in Canada.

- The Committee stated that they are not aware of any superior claims over Crown Land in Canada (other than First Nations land claims) and are waiting for any rebuttal to the notifications sent on July 12, 2024.

The land claim is a key component of the National Concern Trust's purpose and legal foundations as part of the Checks and Balances Committee's governance reform initiatives. It aims to safeguard public lands and ensure proper governance and stewardship of these assets for the benefit of the Canadian people, with potential impacts on public lands administration and Indigenous interests. 

The timing of the land claim and subsequent conveyance into trust on April 12, 2024, was an intentional and tactical move by the Checks and Balances Committee to secure land assets from foreign interests. This strategic action took place during a 90-day window when the trustees of government vacated their offices due to the expiry of the 7-year domestic bankruptcy timeline.

Between April 12th and July 12th, the Checks and Balances Committee had an opportunity to establish itself at the federal level and assert a claim to the land without interference from government officials who lacked legal presence during this period. On the final day of the 90-day trustee vacancy, all relevant parties were notified and provided with a copy of the National Concern Trust's trust indenture.

Ideally, each province and territory should have formed their own constitution and united to establish legitimate sovereignty, separate from the Crown and the Federal Government. Although this idea had been discussed by many Canadians leading up to 2024, the people were unable to organize effectively to make it a reality.

Anticipating that the Federal Government would reassert its authority over the lands and renew its contractual authority, the Checks and Balances Committee took the initiative to safeguard the land from potential corrupt interests. They also notified the Crown of the land acquisition to ensure transparency and proper communication.

By acting swiftly and strategically during the trustee vacancy, the Checks and Balances Committee aimed to protect the land assets and lay the groundwork for a more accountable and transparent governance structure in Canada.

On pages 92-94 and pages 111-112 of the Trust Indenture for National Concern Trust and Checks and Balances Committee it states "RN773743666CA - Assignment of Copyrights" and lists 24 legislative statutes with corresponding Canadian Intellectual Property Office Copyright Registration numbers. 

The Checks and Balances Committee, acting as the Trustee for the National Concern Trust, claims to hold copyrights over various legislative documents that construct the authority for the governance of Canada. Specifically:

1. The Committee states that to the best of their knowledge, no other party has asserted superior copyright ownership over the Canadian statutes that establish the authority for creating each Province and Territory of Canada, their Lieutenant Governors, and the Governor General, since the issuance of Canadian Intellectual Property Office Certificates of Registration in October 2023.

2. The Committee holds these copyrights in trust for the National Concern Trust.

3. The goal of holding these copyrights is part of the Committee's broader efforts to transition Canada towards a Full Responsible Government model and eventually a Direct Republic. This involves altering legislation to reorganize Canada's accounts and change the powers granted to the Head of State, Lieutenant Governors, Commissioners, and Privy Council Office.

4. By asserting copyright control over these foundational legislative documents, the Committee has the legal authority to make changes to Canada's governance structures in line with their stated objectives.

The filing for copyright ownership of Federal and Provincial legislative statutes at the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) was made by several people across Canada. These people filed for copyright ownership of the Canadian legislation. To their surprise, they did receive their ownership registration certificates.

Inspired by these people a conveyance of 24 legislative documents into the National Concern Trust was made on April 12, 2024. The specific legislative documents chosen for this process were strategically selected, as they form the foundation of the government of Canada's authority, including the Privy Council of Canada, the Governor General, Lieutenant Governors, and the founding legislation of several Provinces within the Dominion of Canada.

By gaining control over the documents that established the authority of these positions of power, the Primary Trustee of the National Concern Trust theoretically holds control over those positions and maintains the right to alter the constituting documents, such as the Constitution Act of 1867. Even if the validity of this control is not enforceable, the successful registration of these documents with CIPO highlights a potential lack of oversight within the CIPO office and raises questions about the budget that funds its operation.

The strategic acquisition of copyright ownership over these critical legislative documents represents a significant development in the efforts to reshape the governance structure of Canada. It opens up new possibilities for the Primary Trustee to influence and potentially modify the foundational elements of the country's political system, with far-reaching implications for the distribution of power and the functioning of government institutions.

However, it's important to note that the validity and enforceability of these copyright claims would likely be subject to legal scrutiny and potential challenges, given the complex nature of copyright law and the fundamental role of these legislative documents in Canada's constitutional framework. More information would be needed to fully assess the legal basis and implications of the Committee's copyright claims.

The Trust Indenture for National Concern Trust and Checks and Balances Committee was first conveyed to the Primary Trustee on April 12, 2024, then mailed to the Secondary Trustee (The Privy Council of Canada) on May 31, 2024, and finally 50 copies were sent out to several parties on July 12, 2024.

April 12, 2024:

- The National Concern Trust was established on this date.

- The trust was formed expressly to protect provincial assets and hold land claims on all public land and relevant legislative copyrights.

Between April 12th and July 12th, 2024:

- This 90-day window was strategically chosen by the Checks and Balances Committee to secure land assets from foreign interests while the trustees of government vacated their offices due to the expiry of the 7-year domestic bankruptcy timeline.

- During this period, the Committee had the opportunity to establish itself at the federal level and assert a claim to the land without interference from government officials who lacked legal presence.

May 31, 2024: 

- On this date it was the duty of the Primary Trustee (Checks and Balances Committee) to notify all Secondary Trustee(s) (The Privy Council of Canada as Principal to Agents) within 45 days of the incorporation of Protective Committee.

July 12, 2024:

- On the last day of the 90-day trustee vacancy, all relevant parties were notified and provided with a copy of the National Concern Trust's trust indenture. A total of 50 copies were sent out to all relevant parties on this date.

- The Finance Departments of Canada, several provinces, and the United States Department of the Treasury were informed about the National Concern Trust and the Checks and Balances Committee's intentions, along with the surety bond submitted.

- The Governor General of Canada, Commissioners of Yukon, Northwest Territories, and Nunavut, and Lieutenant Governors of the Provinces were also notified on this date, along with Chief Justices and Deputy Attorney Generals of each Province and Territory.

- The Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague was given a copy in case of internal disputes between the Canadian Government, Provincial Governments, and the National Concern Trust's Primary Trustee.

- The Private Secretary to King Charles III was notified, and an inquiry for formal recognition was made, along with a request for confirmation regarding the ownership of Crown Land in Canada.

- The Privy Council of Canada was sent a Certificate of Trusteeship on this date, as they did not disclaim Trusteeship within 30 days of receiving the initial notice on May 31st, 2024.

These dates mark crucial steps in the Checks and Balances Committee's strategic plan to secure land assets, establish its authority, and notify relevant government bodies and officials about the National Concern Trust and its intentions.

See Historical Relevance.