Introduction

Extensive research, historical analysis, and insider information have revealed a fascinating pattern in the establishment and operation of governments worldwide. This pattern unveils a complex system of contractual timelines and bankruptcy protection cycles that form the foundation of nations' financial and administrative structures. Often hidden from public view, these cycles provide a framework for predicting significant political events and administrative shifts, such as wars or the introduction of new financial systems.

The Nature of Timelines

These timelines are not arbitrary; they constitute an intricate web of legal and financial mechanisms governing national operations. At the core of this system lies the concept of bankruptcy protection timelines, which originate with the issuance of money - essentially a debt or promise to pay, akin to an IOU, promissory note, or bond.

In the past, banknotes served as evidence of a promise to pay, redeemable for gold or silver by a bank. Today's fiat currency system, lacking precious metal backing, relies on an inherent trust relationship, with trustees administering, settling, and discharging accounts.

Historical Context: Monetary Systems and Cycles

Before delving into the lesser-known 70-year and 7-year bankruptcy cycles, it's instructive to examine more familiar monetary periods that closely align with these timelines:

The Bimetallic Standard (1803-1873)

• Established in France, setting a 15.5:1 gold-to-silver ratio

• Many European countries, starting with Germany, began switching to a strictly gold standard in 1871

• Ended with the U.S. Coinage Act of 1873, demonetizing silver

• The Bimetallic 70-year duration coincides with the start of a 7-year Domestic bankruptcy protection cycle that started in 1870

The Bretton Woods System (1944-1971)

• Established post-World War II international monetary system

• Created the IMF and International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD later becoming the World Bank Group)

• Implemented fixed exchange rates pegged to the gold-backed U.S. dollar which was convertible to gold at $35 per ounce

• Ended when President Nixon suspended dollar-gold convertibility

• Its inception aligns closely with a 70-year international bankruptcy protection cycle of 1947

Modern Implications

The unofficial end of the Bretton Woods era (70-73 years later) coincides with the rise of cryptocurrencies and the publication of "The Bitcoin Standard" by Saifedean Ammous in April 2018, proposing an alternative to the gold standard.

These examples illustrate how changes in monetary system administration aim to manage currency and debt, preserve asset sovereignty, and maintain societal stability. They provide context for understanding the hidden cycles of contractual timelines and bankruptcy patterns that shape global governance.

By recognizing these patterns, we gain insight into the complex mechanisms underlying national and international financial systems, offering a new perspective on historical events and potential future developments in global governance.

The Hidden Cycles of Governmental Finance and Sovereignty

At the core of shifting contractual timelines lies a fundamental aspect of governance: the historical need to finance infrastructure and operations. Nations, from their inception and throughout their development, often engage in debt agreements with private bankers and central banks. These financial arrangements are crucial for ensuring continuity in governance and maintaining societal stability.

Recent investigations have unveiled specific domestic and international contractual bankruptcy protection timelines. These timelines serve as a framework for countries and their subdivisions to manage debt repayment while preserving sovereignty over their assets, including land and resources.

The Dual Purpose of Financial Timelines

1. Debt Management: They provide a structured approach for countries to repay their debts while developing essential infrastructure.

2. Asset Protection: These timelines enable nations to maintain sovereignty over their valuable assets, including land and natural resources.

Exploring Historical Evidence

The following sections will present historical examples that illuminate these hidden cycles. It's important to note that validating this information goes beyond simple internet searches. Readers are encouraged to approach the material with an open, analytical mindset to assess the validity of the information and conclusions presented.

A Transition in Governance

The author presents this information to substantiate a significant event: the filing of a trust arrangement by National Concern Trust for the trustee Checks and Balances Committee in Canada on April 12, 2024. This arrangement is purported to facilitate:

1. The reorganization of Canada's governmental structure.

2. A transition from a feudal Constitutional Monarchy system to the full implementation of a Direct Republic.

This proposed shift represents a fundamental change in Canada's governance model, potentially altering the nation's political and financial landscape.

As we delve into the historical examples, it becomes clear that these financial cycles and governance structures are deeply intertwined, often operating beneath the surface of more visible political events. Understanding these patterns offers insight into the complex mechanisms that shape national and international affairs.

In order to follow along the reader must be aware of a variety of contractual timelines that are combined to add up to specific dates of important events. The following chart outlines the key timelines discovered in this research:

Timeline	Duration	Purpose
Domestic Bankruptcy	7 years	Short-term financial restructuring (internal territories)
International Bankruptcy	70 years	Long-term debt management for nations
Death Moratorium	20 years	Period for claiming unclaimed property
Adverse Possession	10 years	Time required to claim ownership of neglected property
Law Solidification	1 year + 1 day	Time for a law to become fully established
Legal Enactment	90 days	Period for something to become legally binding
Trust Law Period	45 days	Time for trust-related actions
Response Window	21 days	Standard time frame for official responses
Communication Return	10 days	Expected turnaround for official communications
Publication Period	5 days	Time for official notices to be considered published
Grace/Rescission Period	3 days	Window for reversing or canceling an action

Understanding Contractual Timelines in Governance

The intricacies of contractual timelines in governance and finance can be complex, but their underlying principles are rooted in providing fair opportunities for response and agreement. These timelines are not arbitrary; rather, they form a coherent system that governs the ebb and flow of administrative power and financial obligations.

The Significance of Response Periods

Each designated period within these timelines serves a specific purpose:

1. Rescission Period (3 days): Allows parties to reconsider or withdraw from an agreement.

2. Publication Period (5 days): Ensures public notification of the agreement or decision.

3. Communication Period (10 days): Provides time for parties to respond or react.

4. Grace Period (3 days): Offers flexibility for unforeseen circumstances.

When combined, these periods create a 21-day framework for official responses. This structure can be extended:

• A response on the 21st day, followed by another 21-day period and a 3-day grace, results in a 45-day trust period.

• Two 45-day trust periods combine to form a 90-day cycle.

Complexity in Timeline Interactions

The interaction between these timelines is not always linear:

• A 90-day or 45-day period might conclude on day 87 or 42, with an event occurring on that day. The cycle becomes complete when including the 3-day grace period.

• Government proclamations often follow a pattern: two 90-day periods, a 21-day period, a 3-day period, and a final 5-day publication with a 3-day grace (totaling 208 days, e.g., from September 17 to April 12).

Nuances in Calculation

When analyzing these patterns, it's crucial to consider:

• Off-by-one discrepancies: The first day may be counted as day zero.

• Additional days: An extra day might officiate no opposition to a contract.

• Leap years: These can add an extra day to the calculation.

These nuances are critical when validating sequences based on the dates of historical events.

The Predictive Power of Understanding Cycles

By comprehending these cycles, we gain the ability to predict and interpret significant events that might otherwise appear random or inexplicable. This understanding provides insight into the structured nature of administrative and financial processes, revealing patterns in what may seem like chaotic historical occurrences.

In essence, these contractual timelines create a framework that balances flexibility with structure, allowing for orderly governance and financial management while accommodating the complexities of real-world situations.

Now let's examine some historical examples that demonstrate the operation of these timelines:

1. The United States Bankruptcy Cycles: A Historical Analysis

Origins and Constitutional Connections (1789)

The United States' financial history is marked by significant bankruptcy cycles that align with key historical events. The first 70-year international bankruptcy began on September 17, 1789, coinciding with the nation's inability to repay a 3 million franc debt to France. This date is particularly noteworthy as it aligns with the U.S. Constitution's signing two years prior and its final ratification by New Hampshire on June 21, 1788 (calculating a 1 year and 1 day timeline and adding 87 days (90 days with 3 days grace) we land back on September 17, 1789).

Cycle Patterns and Civil War Connection

1. First Cycle: September 17, 1789 - September 17, 1859

2. Second Cycle: September 17, 1859 - September 17, 1929

3. Third Cycle: September 17, 1929 - September 17, 1999

A pattern emerges involving specific time periods:

• Two 90-day trust periods

• 21-day official response period

• 5-day publication period

• 3-day grace period

Totaling 208 days, this pattern is observed in both U.S. and Canadian contexts, often triggering significant political events happening on April 12th.

Key Dates and Events

• April 12, 1861: First shots of the American Civil War

  • 1 year and 208 days from September 17, 1859 we see a time period for the creation of new contracts between the end and beginning of a new bankruptcy cycle between the North (the Union) and the South (the Confederacy) triggering significant political upheaval. Confederate forces bombarded Fort Sumter in Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. This attack marked the official beginning of the Civil War between the Union states of the North and the Confederate states of the South. The war would last four years until the Confederacy's surrender in April 1865.

• July 12, 1870: Enactment of the Currency Act

  • 90 days from the important date of April 12 is July 12 where the United States authorized the Treasury to issue new bonds to refinance the national debt and allowed for the issuance of $500 million in 10-year bonds at 5% interest. The act permitted $300 million in 15-year bonds at 4.5% interest and enabled $1 billion in 30-year bonds at 4% interest. The Gold Standard was reinforced by reaffirming the commitment to redeem bonds in coin, effectively reinforcing the gold standard and reduction of interest burden measures were put in place aimed to reduce the interest burden on the national debt by replacing high-interest wartime bonds with lower-interest long-term bonds.

• February 21, 1871: Unification of the District of Columbia's territorial government

  • Two 90-day legal periods and one 45-day trust period from July 12, 1870 the District of Columbia solidified the jurisdiction of the Federal Government.

• June 17, 1871: Ratification of the Treaty of Washington

  • One 90-day legal period, a 21-day response and 5-day publication from February 21, 1871 the ratification of the Treaty of Washington by both the United States and Great Britain to settle outstanding Alabama claims, Fishing Rights, Navigation Rights, and Border disputes between Canada and the United States.

Financial Mechanics and International Relations

The period from 1870 to 1877 saw both the U.S. and Canada establishing crucial financial mechanisms during a 7-year Domestic Bankruptcy protection cycle. This culminated in the settlement of long-standing disputes (the Treaty of Washington), including a $5.5 million award to Newfoundland and Canada in June 1877.

We can confidently state both the United States and Canada had formally set up all their financial mechanics during the 7-year Domestic Bankruptcy protection cycle initiated by the Currency Act of July 12, 1870.

The Great Depression and Modern Era

The third bankruptcy cycle's start (September 17, 1929) preceded the stock market crash by 45 days, leading to the Great Depression. The cycle ending on November 2, 1999, coincided with U.S. election day and was followed by a 90-day transition period, notably marked by the controversial 2000 U.S. presidential election recount.

This phase, extending from November 2nd through January 31st, typically sees political and government representatives, acting as trustees, vacate their offices. The 2000 U.S. presidential election between Al Gore and George Bush, infamous for its "Florida chads" controversy and prolonged recount, coincided with this transition. This extended ballot counting process served a dual function: it captivated public attention while simultaneously obscuring the routine administrative changes occurring behind the scenes - the trustees in Washington, DC lawfully had to vacate the district for 90 days. Such financial and legal maneuverings are hallmarks of these cycle conclusions, often veiled by media narratives that portray events as unprecedented crises. In reality, these transitions represent a standard, albeit complex, component of the governance cycle. The 2000 election exemplifies how regular administrative processes can be overshadowed by high-profile political events, illustrating the intricate interplay between public perception and governmental operations.

2. Hawaii's Annexation and the 20-Year Death Moratorium:

The annexation of Hawaii by the United States offers a compelling illustration of how long-term financial and legal mechanisms can shape historical events. It reveals the intricate interplay between land laws, financial policies, and political outcomes over several decades.

Key Timeline:

1. 1849: Establishment of the 20-Year Death Moratorium

• King Kamehameha III institutes a law stating that land becomes open for settlement if its owner is absent or deceased for 20 years.

1. 
   

2. October 22, 1872: Hawaii's Financial Turning Point

• First issuance of paper money in Hawaii, marking the beginning of the kingdom's bankruptcy.

2. 
   

3. December 7, 1872: Royal Succession and Land Issues

• King Kamehameha V dies (45 days after the first paper money issuance).

• 1.8 million acres of land become potentially available for settlement.

3. 
   

4. December 7, 1892: Expiration of the Death Moratorium

• 20 years after King Kamehameha V's death, triggering the land settlement clause.

4. 
   

5. January 17, 1893: Overthrow of the Hawaiian Monarchy

• Occurs exactly 45 days (trust law period) plus a 3-day grace period after the moratorium's expiration.

Analysis:

The overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy in 1893 was not a spontaneous event but the culmination of a series of carefully timed financial and legal maneuvers. The 20-year death moratorium, established in 1849, set in motion a chain of events that would ultimately lead to Hawaii's annexation by the United States.

The issuance of paper money in 1872, coinciding with the death of King Kamehameha V, marked the beginning of Hawaii's financial vulnerability. As the 20-year period following the king's death came to a close, it created a perfect storm of financial instability and legal opportunity for outside interests.

The precise timing of the overthrow—occurring exactly at the end of the trust law period following the moratorium's expiration—strongly suggests that these events were not coincidental but part of a calculated strategy leveraging the 20-year death moratorium cycle.

3. World War II and Financial Timelines

The interplay between bankruptcy cycles and major historical events reveals intriguing patterns, particularly evident during World War II:

1. Pearl Harbor Attack (December 7, 1941):

• Occurred 69 years and 45 days after Hawaii's first paper money issuance (October 22, 1872)

2. German Invasion of Poland (September 1, 1939):

• Coincided with Poland's emergence from bankruptcy

These examples demonstrate how the conclusion of bankruptcy cycles often aligns with significant political or military events. While such occurrences may seem unexpected to the public, they often form part of a predictable administrative cycle.

4. Canada's Financial Restructuring: From Domestic to International Bankruptcy (1870-1877)

• April 4, 1870: Coinage Act enacted

• 1871: Uniform Currency Act of the introduced

• April 12, 1877: Domestic bankruptcy ends, 70-year international bankruptcy begins

The foundation for Canada's financial restructuring was laid in the early 1870s with two pivotal pieces of legislation. The Coinage Act, enacted on April 4, 1870, was swiftly followed by the Uniform Currency Act of 1871. These acts collectively initiated a 7-year period of domestic bankruptcy for the young nation. This phase concluded precisely seven years later, on April 12, 1877, marking a significant transition. As the domestic bankruptcy period ended, Canada entered into a more extensive 70-year international bankruptcy cycle. The impact of these financial reforms was profound and far-reaching. Within a decade, all provinces had adopted the Uniform Currency Act, effectively ending the era of separate provincial currencies. This unification encompassed the diverse monetary systems previously used across Canada, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, and British Columbia, paving the way for a standardized national currency.

Establishing Judicial Independence and Financial Accountability

- January 10, 1875: Proclamation respecting Judicial Functions of the Supreme Court and the Exchequer Court for the Dominion of Canada

- April 8, 1875 (88 days later and 4 days prior to April 12): Legislation enacted for the Supreme Court and the Exchequer Court for the Dominion of Canada

- September 18, 1875: Proclamation organizing these courts for the Supreme Court and the Exchequer Court for the Dominion of Canada

The establishment of courts independent from Great Britain marked a pivotal moment in Canada's governance structure. This judicial autonomy enabled the creation of a distinct federal jurisdiction, crucial for the nation's sovereign development. More importantly, it provided the necessary framework for effectively managing bankruptcy provisions through a trustee system. This carefully orchestrated legal infrastructure brought all essential elements into alignment, serving a dual purpose. Firstly, it created a robust mechanism for legally and lawfully managing the nation's accounts. Secondly, it established a system to hold representatives accountable for their financial decisions and actions. This judicial and financial framework laid the foundation for Canada's long-term fiscal stability and governmental accountability, representing a significant step in the country's journey towards full autonomy and responsible governance.

Evidence of Financial Maneuvering: The New Loan

• November 6, 1875: Canadian Illustrated News reports "THE NEW LOAN":

  "two and a half million sterling… fifteen million dollars, which the Canadian Minister of Finance Mr. Cartwright has personally placed on the London market, is a matter of very great importance for this country, in several aspects. Three fifths of this amount are guaranteed by the Imperial Government in pursuance of the arrangement made by the Ministry of Sir John Macdonald."

A significant financial development emerged precisely 49 days after the September 18, 1875 proclamation organizing Canada's Supreme Court and Exchequer Court. This timing, occurring two years before the commencement of the 70-year international bankruptcy cycle, is noteworthy. On November 6, 1875, the Canadian Illustrated News published an article titled "THE NEW LOAN," revealing crucial evidence of governmental borrowing. The article's timing—44 days after the proclamation, plus a 5-day publication period—suggests a carefully orchestrated financial strategy. This loan announcement provides tangible evidence of Canada's fiscal preparations leading up to its impending transition in bankruptcy status to the international 70 year cycle.

Pre-Transition Legislative Activity (April 12, 1876)

One year before the transition from domestic to international bankruptcy:

• Consolidation of Canadian Acts and Statutes

• Amendments to Court Acts and Indian Act

• Establishment of various companies:

  • Mail Printing and Publishing Company

  • Shipping and Land Companies

  • Insurance Companies

  • Loan and Investment Companies

• Amalgamation of financial institutions

• Incorporation of the Consolidated Bank of Canada

This flurry of activity aligns with the "1 year + 1 day" timeline for solidifying laws and preparing for the bankruptcy transition.

These patterns reveal a complex interplay between financial cycles, legislative activities, and major historical events, offering a unique perspective on the forces shaping national and international affairs.

The 20-Year Death Moratorium and Jurisdictional Shifts

On April 8, 1875, the enactment of the legislation for forming the Supreme Court and the Court of the Exchequer Court for the Dominion of Canada marked the beginning of a 20-year death moratorium period. While not directly related to land, this event had significant implications for jurisdiction under Her Majesty Queen Victoria. Notably, two years prior to the end of this 20-year pattern, a crucial change occurred:

• June 9, 1893: The Statute Law Revision Act removed the Enacting clause and Authority of Successors of Her Majesty from the Dominion of Canada's Constitution Act, 1867.

  Constitution Act, 1867 repeal of enacting clause:

  "Be it therefore enacted and declared by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the Authority of the same, as follows:"

  Constitution Act, 1867 repeal of Section 2:

  “The Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen extend also to the Heirs and Successors of Her Majesty, Kings and Queens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.”

Water Rights and Legal Developments

Following these jurisdictional changes, important legislation regarding water rights was enacted:

• 1894: The North-west Irrigation Act passed, vesting water ownership in the Crown and establishing the licensed allocation system in western provinces.

The Emergence of Bar Associations

The late 19th century saw the formation of significant legal institutions:

1. 1894: The British Accreditation Registry (BAR) formed with the creation of the General Council of the Bar (Bar Council) in England and Wales. The purpose was to handle breaches of professional conduct, previously managed by judges.

2. 1896: The Canadian Bar Association established, 21 years after the official enactment of the legislation forming the Canadian courts.

This sequence of events raises questions about a potential jurisdictional ownership shift from Her Majesty (the Crown) to the BAR as an entity, particularly given the timing relative to the removal of royal authority clauses.

Traditionally, the Crown has been the embodiment of state power in monarchies like the UK and Canada, representing the authority of the monarchy. Its multifaceted role encompasses the administration of justice, enactment of laws, and ultimate ownership of all land in the kingdom (known as "Crown land"). Legally, the Crown serves as the personification of the state, wielding significant powers in managing the legal system, enforcing laws, and administering public estates, particularly those unclaimed or escheated.

However, the BAR's growing influence, particularly in controlling the legal profession and interpreting laws, has created a complex dynamic. With the Crown's authority seemingly vacant, a "ghost in the machine" phenomenon has emerged, creating a power vacuum that the BAR increasingly occupies. This shift raises concerns about the judiciary's independence and impartiality, as the BAR's control appears to extend throughout the entire system.

The consolidation of power is further exemplified by recent events in British Columbia. During a 90-day trustee vacancy period, we witnessed the removal and abolishment of the Law Society of BC's independent influence. The transition saw a shift from 13,000 members having a say in its operations to a concentrated 17-member board. Notably, this change came into force on May 16, 2024, the last day the BC Legislature sat (57 days prior to the end of the trustee vacancy period occurring on July 12, 2024).

This concentration of power within the judiciary, heavily populated by BAR members, raises critical questions about the balance of power in governance. The significant influence of the BAR over other government branches challenges the fundamental principle of an independent and impartial judicial system, potentially reshaping the landscape of legal and governmental authority.

The International Bar Association

The influence of bar associations continued to grow internationally:

• February 17, 1947: The International Bar Association (IBA) held its inaugural meeting at the House of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York.

• This event took place 55 days prior to April 12, 1947, the start of the new bankruptcy protection period.

These historical events and patterns reveal intriguing connections between legal institutions, governmental authority, and international financial cycles, offering a unique perspective on the evolution of global governance structures.

Historical Patterns: 1947-1954

After 1947, we anticipate a 7-year Domestic Bankruptcy period, accompanied by governmental reorganization of accounts. This period saw significant activities aimed at borrowing money and validating assets:

• Overhaul of the Forest Tenure system in British Columbia

• Natural Resource Conference of 1948 in British Columbia

• Inventory of all resources and consolidation of data

• Substantial changes to bureaucracy promoting private industry leading to the creation of Department of Works and Department of Highways.

Modern Parallels: 2016-2024

We observe similar patterns in recent years:

• Introduction of blockchain technology

• Transfer of resources and Real-World Assets (RWAs) onto blockchain by major corporations and banks (e.g., BlackRock, JP Morgan Chase).

In the seven-year period leading into the 1950s, a comprehensive inventory of resources and consolidation of data was conducted, primarily to recontract land between government and private industry. This pattern parallels in our current era, spanning 2017 through 2024, with the emergence of blockchain technology. Major corporations and banks, including BlackRock and JP Morgan Chase, are actively transferring resources and Real-World Assets (RWAs) onto blockchain platforms. In Canada, this trend is exemplified by the merger of the Blockchain Association of Canada (BAC) with the Chamber of Digital Commerce on February 5, 2019, forming the Chamber of Digital Commerce Canada. As we approach 2025, we anticipate the solidification of blockchain regulations, marking the culmination of this ongoing process of restructuring and recontracting between private industry and government entities.

Key Dates and Events

Governor General Appointments and Governmental Continuity

• April 12, 1946: Appointment of The Right Honourable Harold Rupert Leofric George Alexander, 1st Earl Alexander of Tunis Governor as General of Canada. This date falls 1 year prior to the start of the second 70 year international bankruptcy period

• July 13, 2017: appointed as Governor General of Canada. This date falls 70 years, 1 year, 1 day, and 90 days after April 12, 1946

Julie Payette was appointed after the 90-day rule for public officials to vacate office. This evidence of July 13 points to the intentional continuance of the Federal Government with the installment of a new Governor General.

Water Rights and Regulatory Changes

• February 29, 2016: Introduction of Water Sustainability Act Regulations (WSAR) in British Columbia

• April 15, 2016: Effective date of WSAR (45 days after introduction)

• Exactly one year prior to the end of Canada's second 70-year international bankruptcy implemented to re-contract water rights to the Province

Land Transfers and Settlements

• March 22, 2023: Alberta Transfer of Federal Reserve Land (Order in Council: 080/2023 Stoney Reserves No. 142, 143, 144)

• April 15, 2023: Blueberry River Nation Settlement: $800 million, 44,266 hectares settlement with B.C. and federal government resolving Treaty Land Entitlement claims dating back to 2004.

The introduction of the WSAR in British Columbia was a preemptive measure to re-contract 1 year and 45 days ahead of time while the Alberta Order in Council was made 21 days prior to April 12, 2023. The Blueberry River Nation Settlement started in 2004 follows the 20 year death moratorium and a one year re-contracting before the end of the 7 year domestic bankruptcy cycle.

Speculative Events: 2024-2025

July 2024: Fire Incidents

• July 15, 2024: Numerous fires develop in southeast and central interior of BC

• July 22, 2024: At 9:59 PM, an evacuation order was issued for the town of Jasper, Alberta. Additionally. Over 20,000 lightning strikes in BC, sparking new fires

• July 25, 2024: Regional District of Central Kootenay issues evacuation order

While the fire incidents could be attributed to natural causes, some observers have proposed alternative theories. These speculations suggest the possibility of man-made origins or even the use of directed energy weapons. The timing of these events, coinciding with the 90 day trustee vacancy period and expiry of existing land contracts, has led to conjecture about their potential connection to land claims. According to this theory, the fires might serve as a means to secure interest in the land by necessitating emergency services. This would be achieved through emergency acts initiated by municipalities and districts within British Columbia, rather than at the provincial level. While such theories remain unsubstantiated, they highlight the complex interplay between natural disasters, land rights, and governmental jurisdictions during periods of administrative transition.

Legislative Changes and Expirations

• June 30, 2024: Expiration of Land Use Contracts in British Columbia

  British Columbia Local Government Act:

  547 (1) All land use contracts are terminated on June 30, 2024. (2) A local government that has jurisdiction over land subject to a land use contract must, by June 30, 2022, adopt a zoning bylaw that will apply to the land on June 30, 2024.

• June 30, 2025: Sunset clause in Canadian Bank Act

  Canada Bank Act, Sunset provision:

  21 (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (4), banks shall not carry on business, and authorized foreign banks shall not carry on business in Canada, after June 30, 2025.

These events occurring before the end of the 90 day trustee vacancy period and 1 year later reveal intriguing patterns in governmental reorganization, land rights, and financial systems, potentially pointing to broader cycles in global governance.

A Note on Speculation and Evidence

While the author acknowledges that some of the examples presented above are speculative and may not fully explain the actual reasons behind certain events, we encourage readers to approach these ideas with an open yet critical mind. It is important to distinguish between established facts and more speculative connections.

The evidence regarding land use contracts and sunset provisions undeniably demonstrates a reorganization of significant land and financial legislation. This forms a solid foundation for our analysis. However, as we delve into more complex and potentially controversial territory, we ask readers to consider the following points carefully.

Exploring Uncomfortable Possibilities

In the spirit of thorough investigation, we now turn to a hypothesis that may challenge some readers' preconceptions. While the following speculation may be unsettling, it is presented here for consideration and further discussion, not as established fact. We invite readers to engage critically with these ideas, considering their implications while maintaining a healthy skepticism.

Genetic Modification and Patent Law: A Potential Loophole

If a foreign party wanted to make a claim to a human body and/or their estates (land) they would need to create an interest in that abandoned land that has been unclaimed for 21 years. Since patenting nature is prohibited, modifying the human genome through gene-silencing technology in mRNA vaccines could potentially allow claims of ownership over genetically modified human organisms. This speculation aligns with the timing of vaccine administration on December 14, 2020 (Operation Warp Speed), precisely 21 years and 88 days after the end of the United States' international bankruptcy occurring on September 17, 1999.

The Convergence of Land, Body, and Estate in Legal Definitions

The legal definitions of land, body, and estate exhibit a striking convergence that has far-reaching implications for global governance and property rights. The Land Titles Act of Alberta defines "land" meaning land, messuages, tenements and hereditaments, corporeal and incorporeal, of every nature and description, and every estate or interest therein, whether the estate or interest is legal or equitable, together with paths, passages, ways, watercourses, liberties, privileges and easements appertaining thereto and trees and timber thereon, and mines, minerals and quarries thereon or thereunder lying or being, unless any of them are specially excepted. This broad definition blurs the lines between tangible property and abstract legal concepts.

Similarly, the Bouvier Law Dictionary of 1914 defines "estate" as having several meanings. In its most extensive sense, it is applied to signify every thing of which riches or fortune may consist, and includes personal and real property : hence we say, personal estate, real estate. But as the word is commonly used in the settlement of estates, it does include the debts as well as the assets of a bankrupt or decedent, all his obligations and resources being regarded as one entirety.

The Birth Registration as Origin of Estate

The concept of an estate originates from the birth registration process, which records the “weights and measures” of a body and converts them into a legal title. This title forms the basis for various identity documents, effectively creating a "fictional" vessel or corporate judicial person. This process raises questions about the ownership and control of one's own legal identity and estate.

Unclaimed Estates and Government Custody

Many individuals may be unaware that they or their parents never formally claimed ownership of their original birth registration or estate upon reaching the age of majority (which most of the time is the age of 21 years old). This oversight has allowed governments to assume custody of bodies and property, treating them as if they were "lost at sea" or deceased. The government assumes the role of a trustee, temporarily holding titles in trust until a living individual reclaims their rights. During this period, a birth certificate is issued, accompanied by a social insurance policy. This policy allows for the licensed use of the unclaimed property. While the government maintains custody, it charges taxes and creates policies related to this property. When individuals identify themselves using their birth certificate, they effectively become government trustees and public employees. 

Historical Context: The Cestui Que Vie Act 1666

The Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666, enacted in response to crises in London (the Great Plague of 1665 and the Great Fire of 1666, which devastated London), established a precedent for government management of private property in times of upheaval. While the Act did not declare individuals dead, it treated them as such for property management purposes until rightful owners could be identified. This principle continues to influence modern legal systems wherever BAR (British Accreditation Registry) attorneys operate operating as legal representatives for “cestui que vie” (Latin for “person whose life is in trust”).

Bankruptcy Cycles and Contract Renewals

Following extended 70-year bankruptcy protection cycles, prior contracts expire, necessitating the initiation of new agreements. This includes foundational constitutional documents and land claims. Those with evidence of interest gain priority in administering these new contracts.

While these connections may seem speculative, they highlight the complex interplay between legal definitions, property rights, and emerging technologies. As we navigate the hidden cycles of global governance, it is crucial to critically examine the legal frameworks that shape our understanding of ownership, identity, and human rights.

The Hidden Administrative Law: Unveiling Cyclical Patterns

The discovery of contractual timelines and bankruptcy cycles in global governance provides a powerful lens through which to view historical events and current affairs. This hidden administrative law suggests that many seemingly spontaneous or crisis-driven events may, in fact, be predictable outcomes of long-standing financial and administrative cycles.

Understanding these patterns challenges us to look beyond surface-level explanations and consider the deeper, cyclical forces that shape our world. By recognizing these underlying structures, we gain unprecedented insight into the workings of global power structures and the true drivers of historical change.

Implications and Future Perspectives

This research opens up new avenues for understanding the true nature of governance and international relations. The ability to identify and analyze these cycles offers a valuable tool for:

• Predicting and interpreting global events

• Comprehending why certain events occur at specific times

• Potentially forecasting future developments

Such insights can lead to more informed decision-making and a deeper understanding of the hidden structures governing world events.

Establishment of Oversight Bodies

In response to these revelations, two significant entities were established:

1. National Concern Trust

2. Checks and Balances Committee

Both were created on April 12, 2024, with final notices sent to all interested parties on July 12, 2024. This strategic move was directly informed by the data presented in this article.

Notably, land claims and select copyrights were conveyed in trust on the same day these entities were established. While the immediate significance of these actions may not be apparent, they undoubtedly represent a strategic move to trigger the reorganization of administrative accounts behind the scenes.

Conclusion

By being aware of these cyclical patterns and administrative changes, we can make calculated moves to secure the people's self-determination. As we continue to uncover and analyze these patterns, we may gain an ever-clearer picture of the hidden mechanisms driving global governance, allowing for more strategic and informed engagement with the systems that shape our world.

Copyright © 2024 Checks and Balances Committee Ltd. All rights reserved.